- Solutions
- Products
- Community
- Resources
- Company
When someone refers to recruiting, most people think about the process of attracting job seekers, interviewing candidates, and making a final hire. This process is a common form of recruiting, but it represents only one type of recruiting — external recruiting.
Recruiting encompasses both external recruiting and internal recruiting, which is the process of filling an open role with an existing employee. When applied correctly, the two methods work together to provide organizations the talent they need to achieve their goals.
In this article, we’ll provide in-depth definitions of internal and external recruiting, describe the strengths and weaknesses of each method, and lay out the best practices associated with each approach.
Internal and external recruiting accomplish the same goal — they place talent into open roles. Each method, however, comes with distinct benefits and drawbacks. Recruiters must decide which method to use based on the role they’re trying to fill and other details about their organization.
Internal recruiting is the process of hiring from within an organization’s existing workforce. An organization using internal recruiting doesn’t advertise open roles on career sites or job boards. Instead, the organization looks for candidates within its own ranks.
There are a few situations where internal recruiting is the preferred recruiting method:
External recruitment is the process of attracting and selecting candidates from outside an organization to fill job vacancies or add talent with in-demand skills.
External recruiting is especially effective when an organization needs to:
Internal recruiting is often the cheaper, faster way to close an open role. It’s also an excellent method of retaining, developing and championing valued employees. For all its advantages, however, it presents some limitations, too.
Here are the top benefits internal recruiting offers organizations:
While internal recruiting is an effective hiring strategy, organizations should be aware of its drawbacks.
External recruitment may cost more than internal recruitment in terms of money, time and effort. But it allows organizations to place talent who offer many advantages.
Here are the best features external recruiting has to offer:
External recruiting has its drawbacks, too. Here are a few that are essential to consider:
Internal recruitment is a fast, simple way to fill an open role. But it doesn’t happen on its own. Recruiters can implement a few different methods to make internal recruitment an effective talent strategy.
When employers offer career development opportunities, they’re not only enriching the skills of their current employees. They’re also equipping employees to take on new roles within the organization.
An employer that prioritizes internal mobility may make leadership training readily available. Employees who have taken advantage of the trainings will be more prepared for management positions when they arise.
Employee referrals act as a bridge between internal and external recruitment. When employees tap into their professional networks, they provide reliable recommendations for candidates with strong potential. What’s more, employees’ willingness to recommend their employer to former colleagues signals a strong workplace culture.
Employers looking to implement internal recruiting can apply many of the best practices they use for external recruiting. They can, for example, post positions to an internal job board to make sure employees are notified of the vacancy. This practice democratizes internal recruiting, ensuring that employees are afforded equal access to new opportunities.
Talent pipelining is an important recruiting strategy, and it’s a useful way to bolster internal recruiting efforts. Some positions follow a clear progression, where entry-level talent climbs an established ladder to more senior positions. These talent pipelines are fairly easy to build, as career pathways make way for an upward flow of talent.
Succession planning is slightly more complicated, but it is best understood as a form of internal recruitment. When employers invest in the development and engagement of current employees, they gain access to an internal network of talent who are prepared for senior roles that benefit from strong institutional knowledge.
When recruiters need to bring in external talent to fill an open role, they typically use a combination of strategies to draw the interest of strong applicants.
Career sites are one of the most crucial elements of an employer’s external recruitment strategy. It’s often the first place job seekers go to learn more about a potential employer. That said, it’s important that career sites effectively showcase an employer’s employee value proposition.
A recruitment platform is one of the most important tools in a recruiter’s toolbox, especially when recruiting externally. It centralizes the many processes involved in external recruiting, allowing recruiters to manage, automate and streamline their hiring workflows.
In the virtual age, an organization’s in-person presence can make a powerful impression on candidates. Recruiters can use these opportunities — which range from career fairs to networking events — to cultivate connections with job seekers, build their employer brand and strengthen their presence.
Recruitment agencies excel at supplying talent and come as an important strategic tool for organizations that lack strong recruiting departments. Some employers with talent talent teams still tap agencies to search for specialized talent or executive-level candidates.
It’s up to recruiters to create the right blend of internal and external hiring — one that connects organizations with the hires they need without sacrificing on important factors like candidate quality or workforce diversity.
Succession planning makes a helpful introduction to internal recruitment. By preparing employees to take on a more advanced position over time, recruiters and managers learn to spot potential in employees early on. Then they hone the skill of developing employees gradually, positioning them for success in their new role.
When it comes time to fill an open role, talent teams must use contextual clues to choose the right recruiting method. Internal recruitment yields hires who bring deep company knowledge. External candidates offer sharp skills and fresh perspectives. Recruiters should weigh their needs and choose between the two approaches appropriately.
An over-reliance on internal recruiting may slow an employer’s progress toward cultivating a diverse workforce. Employers who use internal recruiting methods should be sure to prioritize underrepresented talent pools when they do recruit externally, so that they bring diverse talent into the company whenever possible.
To make sure external candidates are as diverse as possible, talent acquisition teams should get creative with sourcing methods. They can find candidates through multiple channels such as referrals, job boards, professional societies, social media and career fairs.
To encourage a blend of recruitment methods, it’s essential to offer career development opportunities to internal talent so that they’re prepared to take on more advanced positions or make lateral moves to different departments.
Internal and external recruiting are two distinct methods of talent acquisition that offer two different sets of benefits. Thankfully, recruiters don’t need two tools to implement both approaches.
With the help of tools like iCIMS Talent Cloud Platform, recruiters can execute internal and external recruiting in one centralized location. The platform allows recruiters to track external candidates, promote internal roles, and make data-driven hiring decisions.